— has a few connotations, most notably that everything
. Within the context of machine based consciousness, it can be limited and turned around.
Little messy here, for now:
- Everything possesses consciousness (in the broadest sense of the word: everything) — This is the very high-level definition which is very well described (but not held) by David Chalmers. It includes things like "the number two."
- Consciousness is a state of matter — Just like liquid, gas, solid, plasma, are states of matter. This would seem to imply (jmo) that matter may, or may not, take up a state of consciousness, and that it may be in a conscious state, and not be in any other states.
- Consciousness is a fundamental characteristic of matter — These include characteristics like gravity, charge, mass, place, etc. These normally all exist simultaneously, as part of what makes matter, matter. For the record, this one seems most plausible to me. It comes from my own thesis that learning —entities not merely interacting, but adapting to each other— is ubiquitous, and that inter-adaptation can be observed, even between particles at the smallest scales. This is seen in the observer effect, for example.
- Consciousness is a mental state of matter — This is the thesis that fundamental particles, such as electrons, and quarks, might have a mental state, which is consciousness.
As stated, I'm currently in the camp that considers panpsychism's "characteristic" connotation to be the most consistent with current understanding. In this connotation, panpsychism is described as the notion that consciousness is a fundamental characteristic of matter just as things like mass, gravity, and charge are characteristics of matter.
I would personally add that it may be a characteristic of matter, as well as
forces, or more succinctly, of volumetric phenomena (phenomena that take up, or exist in, multi-dimensional space).
. . . . . . .
Sources & Resources